Stuckle & Associates PLLC
(972) 423-4405
Schedule Your Free Consultation
Proudly serving the
entire state of Texas.
  •   ›  
  • Case Results

Case Results

When faced with a false or exaggerated criminal charge such as child abuse, sexual assault, or domestic violence, you need to make sure that you have an experienced advocate at your side. In addition to client testimonials and peer reviews, an attorney's track record can provide valuable information as you research your prospective legal counsel. Since many attorneys handle various aspects of criminal defense, it's also important to make sure that your attorney has extensive experience with cases involving charges that you face.

View a sample of our case results for charges of child abuse, domestic violence, and sexual crimes in Texas:

Please note that the outcomes of the cases listed below are not indicative of the results of the outcome of your case. Every case is unique and even through two cases may appear similar, even the smallest details can affect the outcome.


Acquittals – Not Guilty Verdicts

1. CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of A Child
LOCATION: Collin County, Texas
RESULT:
Acquitted; Not Guilty
DETAILS: Client was charged with sexual intercourse with a 10 year old female. Stuckle and Ferguson took the case to a jury trial and won. Client was acquitted and found not guilty.

2. CHARGE: Indecency with a Child
LOCATION:
Collin County, Texas
RESULT: Acquitted; Not Guilty
DETAILS: Client was charged with sexual intercourse with a 12 year old female. Stuckle and Ferguson took the case to a jury trial and won. Client was acquitted and found not guilty.

3. CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION:
Collin County, Texas
RESULT: Acquitted; Not Guilty
DETAILS: Client was charged with sexual molestation of a 11 year old female. Stuckle and Ferguson took the case to a jury trial and won. Client was acquitted and found not guilty.

4. CHARGE: Indecency with a Child
LOCATION:
Collin County, Texas
RESULT: Acquitted; Not Guilty
DETAILS: Complainant, a 12 year old female, claimed Client touched her sexually. Stuckle and Ferguson took the case to a jury trial and won. Client was acquitted and found not guilty.

5. CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION:
Dallas County, Texas
RESULT:
Acquitted; Not Guilty
DETAILS: Client was accused of sexually touching a 5 year old female. Stuckle and Ferguson took the case to a jury trial and won. Client was acquitted and found not guilty.

6. CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION:
Collin County, Texas
RESULT: Acquitted; Not Guilty
DETAILS: Complainant, a 9 year old female accused Client of sexual molestation. Stuckle and Ferguson took the case to a jury trial and won. Client was acquitted and found not guilty.

7. CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION:
Collin County, Texas
RESULT: Acquitted; Not Guilty
DETAILS: Client was charged with the sexual touching of complainant, a 10 year old female. Stuckle and Ferguson took the case to a jury trial and won. Client was acquitted and found not guilty.

8. CHARGE: Indecency with a Child
LOCATION:
Collin County, Texas
RESULT: Acquitted; Not Guilty
DETAILS: Complainant, a 12 year old female, claimed Client touched her sexually. Stuckle and Ferguson took the case to a jury trial and won. Client was acquitted and found not guilty.

9. CHARGE: Indecency with a Child
LOCATION:
Collin County, Texas
RESULT: Acquitted; Not Guilty
DETAILS: Client was accused by a 12 year old female of causing her to touch him sexually. Stuckle and Ferguson took the case to a jury trial and won. Client was acquitted and found not guilty.

10. CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION:
Tarrant County, Texas
RESULT: Acquitted; Not Guilty
DETAILS: Client was accused of the child molestation of a 13 year old complainant. Stuckle and Ferguson took the case to a jury trial and won. Client was acquitted and found not guilty.

11. CHARGE: Indecency with a Child
LOCATION:
Collin County, Texas
RESULT: Acquitted; Not Guilty
DETAILS: Complainant, a 10 year old female, charged Client with touching her sexually. Stuckle and Ferguson took the case to a jury trial and won. Client was acquitted and found not guilty.

12. CHARGE: Indecency with a Child
LOCATION:
Collin County, Texas
RESULT: Acquitted; Not Guilty
DETAILS: Client was accused of the sexual molestation of Complainant, a 10 year old female. Stuckle and Ferguson took the case to a jury trial and won. Client was acquitted and found not guilty.

13. CHARGE: Indecency with a Child
LOCATION:
Tarrant County, Texas
RESULT: Acquitted; Not Guilty
DETAILS: Client was accused of inappropriate sexual touching of a 12 year old complainant. Stuckle and Ferguson took the case to a jury trial and won. Client was acquitted and found not guilty.

14. CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION:
Collin County, Texas
RESULT: Acquitted; Not Guilty
DETAILS: Client was accused of sexual intercourse with a 12 year old female. Stuckle and Ferguson took the case to a jury trial and won. Client was acquitted and found not guilty.

15. CHARGE: Indecency with a Child
LOCATION:
Collin County, Texas
RESULT: Acquitted; Not Guilty
DETAILS: Client was accused by an 11 year old female of inappropriate sexual touching. Stuckle and Ferguson took the case to a jury trial and won. Client was acquitted and found not guilty.

16. CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION: Collin County, Texas
RESULT: Acquitted; Not Guilty
DETAILS: Client was accused of child molestation of a 10 year old female. Stuckle and Ferguson took the case to a jury trial and won. Client was acquitted and found not guilty.

17. CHARGE: Indecency with a Child
LOCATION: Tarrant County, Texas
RESULT: Acquitted; Not Guilty
DETAILS: Client was accused of causing a 13 year old complainant to sexually touch him. Stuckle and Ferguson took the case to a jury trial and won. Client was acquitted and found not guilty.

18. CHARGE: Indecency with A Child
LOCATION: Collin County, Texas
RESULT: Acquitted; Not Guilty
DETAILS: Complainant, a 9 year old female, claimed Client touched her sexually. Stuckle and Ferguson took the case to a jury trial and won. Client was acquitted and found not guilty.

19. CHARGE: Possession of Child Pornography
LOCATION:
O’Fallon, Illinois
RESULT: Acquitted; Not Guilty
DETAILS: Client was charged with possession of child pornography. Stuckle and Ferguson took the case to a jury trial and won. Client was acquitted and found not guilty.

20. CHARGE: Assault
LOCATION: Dallas County, Texas
RESULT: Acquitted, Not Guilty
DETAILS: Client charged with physically assaulting police officers. Stuckle and Ferguson took the case to a jury trial and won. The Client was acquitted and found not guilty.


Return to Top

Dismissals

1. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. B.P.
CHARGE: Indecency with a Child
LOCATION: Parker County, Texas
RESULT: Charge Reduction to a misdemeanor
DETAILS: Complainant, an 11 year old female, accused client of sexually inappropriate touching. Stuckle and Ferguson took the case to a jury trial and it ended in a mistrial. The District Attorney reduced the charge from a felony Indecency with a Child to a misdemeanor Reckless Conduct. The Client agreed to accept the lesser charge and does not have any sex offender requirements.

2. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. J.M.
CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION: Dallas County, Texas
RESULT: Case dismissed and expunged
DETAILS: Client was charged with child molestation of a 4 year old child. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared the case for a jury trial. The State dismissed the case rather than go to trial. Stuckle and Ferguson pursued and obtained an expunction for the Client to clear his name.

3. CASE STYLE: The State of Texas vs. J.G.
CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION: Ellis County, Texas
RESULT: Case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was charged with inappropriate sexual touching of a 3 year old child.
Stuckle and Ferguson prepared the case for a jury trial. The State dismissed the case rather than go to trial.

4. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. J.S.
CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION: Collin County, Texas
RESULT: Case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused of exposing himself to his 4 year old grandson. Stuckle and Ferguson investigated the case and negotiated with the authorities resulting in the matter being dismissed.

5. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. B.T.
CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION: Tarrant County, Texas
RESULT: Case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was charged with sexual molestation of a 4 year old female. Stuckle and Ferguson investigated the case and negotiated with the authorities resulting in the matter being dismissed.

6. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. J.O.
CHARGE: Injury to a Child
LOCATION: Tarrant County
RESULT: Case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused of intentionally breaking the leg of her 18 month old daughter. Stuckle and Ferguson investigated the case and negotiated with the authorities resulting in the matter being dismissed.

7. CASE STYLE: State vs. J.A.
CHARGE: Indecency with a Child
LOCATION: Collin County, Texas
RESULT: Case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused of the sexually inappropriate touching an 8 year old female. Stuckle and Ferguson investigated the case, procuring expert and medical reports. The firm negotiated with the authorities resulting in the matter being dismissed.

8. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. P.B.
CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION: Collin County, Texas
RESULT: Case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused of the sexual molestation of a 3 year old female. Stuckle and Ferguson investigated the case and obtained expert reports. The firm negotiated with the authorities resulting in the matter being dismissed.

9. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. D.F.
CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION: Tarrant County, Texas
RESULT: Case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused of sexual molestation and inappropriate touching of an 11 year old female.
Stuckle and Ferguson investigated the case and obtained expert reports. The firm negotiated with the authorities resulting in the matter being dismissed.

10. CASE STYLE: The State of Texas vs. A.S.
CHARGE: Assault Family Violence
LOCATION: Grayson County, Texas
RESULT: Case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was charged with striking his girlfriend and interfering with an emergency telephone call. Stuckle and Ferguson investigated the case and received an affidavit of non-prosecution from the alleged victim. The firm convinced the District Attorney to dismiss the case.

11. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. J.W.
CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION: Tarrant County, Texas
RESULT: Case dismissed      
DETAILS: A 12 year old female accused Client of sexual molestation and inappropriate touching. Stuckle and Ferguson investigated the case and obtained expert reports. The firm negotiated with the authorities resulting in the matter being dismissed.

12. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. C.W.
CHARGE: Assault- Family Violence
LOCATION: Dallas County, Texas
RESULT: Case dismissed
DETAILS: Client charged with physically assaulting his girlfriend. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared the case for a jury trial. The State dismissed the case rather than go to trial.

13. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. G.T.
CHARGE: Indecency with a Child
LOCATION: Collin County, Texas
RESULT: Case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused of sexually touching a 13 year old female. Stuckle and Ferguson investigated the case and obtained expert reports. The firm negotiated with the authorities resulting in the matter being dismissed.

14. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. G.C.
CHARGE: Injury to a Child
LOCATION: Dallas County, Texas
RESULT: Case dismissed.
DETAILS: Client was accused of physically abusing a 4 year old female. Stuckle and Ferguson investigated the case and negotiated with the authorities resulting in the matter being dismissed.

15. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. N.M.
CHARGE: Assault-Family Violence
LOCATION: Collin County, Texas
RESULT: Case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused of striking his wife in the face. Stuckle and Ferguson investigated the case and negotiated with the authorities resulting in the matter being dismissed.

17. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. D.P.
CHARGE:
Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION: Collin County, Texas
RESULT: Case Dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused of sexual molestation of a child younger than 14 years old. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared the case for a jury trial. The State dismissed all charges rather than go to trial.

18. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. D.P.
CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of A Child
LOCATION: Collin County, Texas
RESULT: Case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused of sexual molestation of a child younger than 14 years old. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared the case for a jury trial. The State dismissed all charges rather than go to trial.

19. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. D.P.     
CHARGE: Indecency with a Child
LOCATION: Collin County, Texas
RESULT: Case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused of sexual inappropriate touching of a child younger than 17 years old. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared the case for a jury trial. The State dismissed all charges rather than go to trial.

20. CASE STYLE: State of North Dakota vs. B.W.
CHARGE: Gross Sexual Imposition
LOCATION: McIntosh County, North Dakota
RESULT: Case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was charged with having sexual intercourse with a 9 year old female. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared the case for a jury trial. The State dismissed all charges rather than go to trial.

21. CASE STYLE: State of North Dakota vs. B.W.
CHARGE: Gross Sexual Imposition
LOCATION: McIntosh County, North Dakota
RESULT: Case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was charged with the child molestation of a 10 year old female.
Stuckle and Ferguson prepared the case for a jury trial. The State dismissed all charges rather than go to trial.

22. CASE STYLE: State of North Dakota vs. B.W.
CHARGE: Gross Sexual Imposition
LOCATION: McIntosh County, North Dakota
RESULT: Case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused of inappropriate sexual contact of a 12 year old female. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared the case for a jury trial. The State dismissed all charges rather than go to trial.

23. CASE STYLE: State of North Dakota vs. B.W.
CHARGE: Gross Sexual Imposition
LOCATION: McIntosh County, North Dakota
RESULT: Case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused of inappropriate sexual contact with a 10 year old female. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared the case for a jury trial. The State dismissed all charges rather than go to trial.


Return to Top

Grand Jury “No-Bill” Dismissals

1. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. D.W.
CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of A Child
LOCATION: Collin County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by Grand Jury; Case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was charged with the sexual abuse of his step-daughter who was 13 years old. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including expert reports, polygraphs, and sexual proclivity examinations. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

2. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. R.S.
CHARGE: Indecency with a Child
LOCATION: Collin County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by Grand Jury; Case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused by his 11 year old granddaughter of inappropriate sexual touching. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including expert reports, a polygraph, sexual proclivity examinations and a recantation from the complainant. Armed with this information the grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

3. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. M.R.
CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION: Brazoria County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by Grand Jury; case dismissed.
DETAILS: Client was accused of the child molestation of his 16 year old daughter. Stuckle-Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, and sexual proclivity examinations. The grand jury “no-billed” this case resulting in a dismissal.

4. CASE STYLE: State vs. L.P.
CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of A Child
LOCATION: Collin County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by Grand Jury; case dismissed
DETAILS: Complainant, a 13 year old female, accused Client of inappropriate sexual touching. Complainant was the friend of Client’s son. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, and sexual proclivity examinations. Armed with this information the grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

5. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. J.Q.
CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of A child
LOCATION: Collin County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by Grand Jury; case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was charged with sexual intercourse of his 8 year old daughter. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, and sexual proclivity examinations. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

6.   CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. M.R.
CHARGE: Injury to a Child
LOCATION: Collin County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by Grand Jury; Case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was charged with choking and slamming the body of his 7 year old daughter against his vehicle. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph and expert reports. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

7.  CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. M.H.
CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of A Child
LOCATION: Hood County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by Grand Jury; Case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused of the child molestation of his 4 year old daughter. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, and sexual proclivity examinations. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

8. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. V.G.
CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of A Child
LOCATION: Hildalgo County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by Grand Jury; Case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was charged with the child molestation of a 4 year old neighbor girl. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, and sexual proclivity examinations. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

9. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. J.C.
CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION: Collin County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by Grand Jury; Case dismissed.
DETAILS: Client was charged with forcing a 3 year old female to inappropriately touch herself.
Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, and sexual proclivity examinations. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

10. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. J.E.
CHARGE: Indecency with A Child
LOCATION: Denton County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by Grand Jury; Case dismissed.
DETAILS: Complainant, a 14 year old female accused Client of sexually inappropriate touching. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, and sexual proclivity examinations. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

11. CASE STYLE: The State of Texas vs. S.G.
CHARGE: Sexual Assault
LOCATION: Tom Green County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by Grand Jury; Case dismissed.
DETAILS: Complainant, a 21 year old female accused Client of child molestation. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, and sexual proclivity examinations. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

12. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. S.P.
CHARGE: Indecency with a Child
LOCATION: Collin County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by the Grand Jury; Case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused of inappropriate sexual touching of a 15 year old female. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, and sexual proclivity examinations. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

13. CASE STYLE: The State of Texas vs. B.C.
CHARGE: Indecency with a Child
LOCATION: Tarrant County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by the Grand Jury; case dismissed.
DETAILS: Client was accused of the child molestation of his stepson. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, and sexual proclivity examinations. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

14. CASE STYLE: The State of Texas vs. P.D.
CHARGE: Sexual Assault of A Child
LOCATION: Tarrant County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by the Grand Jury; case dismissed.
DETAILS: Complainant, the 16 year old step-daughter of Client, accused Client of having sexual intercourse with her. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, and sexual proclivity examinations. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

15.  CASE STYLE: The State of Texas vs. M.B.
CHARGE: Indecency with a Child
LOCATION: Collin County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by the Grand Jury; case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused of the child molestation of his 5 year old adopted son. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, and sexual proclivity examinations. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

16. CASE STYLE: The State of Texas vs. T.B.
CHARGE: Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION: Hunt County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by the Grand Jury; case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused of the inappropriate sexual touching of a 4 year old male. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, and sexual proclivity examinations. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

17. CASE STYLE: The State of Texas vs. J.B.
CHARGE: Indecency with A Child
LOCATION: Tarrant County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by the Grand Jury; case dismissed
DETAILS: Complainant, the 14 year old step-daughter of Client, accused Client of inappropriate sexual touching. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, and sexual proclivity examinations. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

18.  CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. M.H.
CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of A Child
LOCATION: Kaufman County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by Grand Jury; case dismissed
DETAILS: 14 year old Complainant accused client of inappropriate sexual touching. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, sexual proclivity examinations, and a legal analysis. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

19. CASE STYLE: State vs. J.M.
CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION: Dallas County
RESULT: No-billed by Grand Jury; case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused of the child molestation of a 4 year old complainant under his care. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, sexual proclivity examinations, and a legal analysis. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

20. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. J.P.
CHARGE: Injury to a Child
LOCATION: Collin County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by the Grand Jury; case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused of intentionally dropping his 3 month year old infant resulting in serious bodily injury. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, medical examination, and a legal analysis. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

21. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. M.A.
CHARGE: Indecency with a Child
LOCATION: Denton County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by the Grand Jury; case dismissed
DETAILS: A 15 year old complainant female alleged Client sexually touched her. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, medical examination, and a legal analysis. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

22. CASE STYLE: State vs. T.J.
CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION: Collin County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by Grand Jury; case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused of child molestation of his 6 year old daughter. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, medical examination, and a legal analysis. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

23.  CASE STYLE: State vs. V.K.
CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION: Ector County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by Grand Jury; case dismissed.
DETAILS: Client was accused of the inappropriate sexual touching of a 14 year old male. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, sexual proclivity examination, and a legal analysis. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

24. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. E.O.
CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION: Tarrant County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by the Grand Jury; case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused of sexual intercourse with an 11 year old female. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, sexual proclivity examination, and a legal analysis. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

25. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. A.T.
CHARGE: Indecency with a Child
LOCATION: Henderson County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by Grand Jury; case dismissed
DETAILS: A 14 year old female accused Client of inappropriate sexual touching. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, sexual proclivity examination, and a legal analysis. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

26.  CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. D.M.
CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION: Tarrant County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by the Grand Jury; case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused of inappropriate sexual touching of a 9 year old female.
Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, sexual proclivity examination, and a legal analysis. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

27. CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. J.R.
CHARGE: Indecency with a Child
LOCATION: Smith County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by Grand Jury; case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused of the child molestation of a 4 year old boy. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, sexual proclivity examination, and a legal analysis. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

28.   CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. R.S
CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION: Travis County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by the Grand Jury; case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused of the child molestation of a 5 year old female. Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, sexual proclivity examination, and a legal analysis. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

29.  CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. L.H.
CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
LOCATION: Denton County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by Grand Jury; case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was accused of the child molestation of his 13 year old step-daughter.
Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, sexual proclivity examination, and a legal analysis. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

30.  CASE STYLE: State of Texas vs. D.T.
CHARGE: Aggravated Sexual Assault of A Child
LOCATION: Tom Green County, Texas
RESULT: No-billed by the Grand Jury; case dismissed
DETAILS: Client was charged with the child molestation of his 13 year old step-daughter.
Stuckle and Ferguson prepared an extensive grand jury defense packet including a polygraph, expert reports, sexual proclivity examination, and a legal analysis. The grand jury “no-billed” the case resulting in a dismissal.

Return to Top